Data and Analytics
As automated valuation models (AVMs) continue to become more advanced, real estate and mortgage industry professionals must transition from solely relying on the more traditional manual appraisal methods to adopting modern valuation solutions. These can help reduce costs, streamline workflows, and better inform business decisions earlier in the property valuation process. Further, the right AVM solutions can help provide more efficient and credible options when it comes to property valuation.
AVMs can be used independently or as part of a solution that leverages multiple models. Utilizing the latter option can help provide the user with optimal results by covering a wider range of valuation metrics each AVM specializes in, such as accuracy, coverage and hit rate.
In this article, we discuss the benefits of using a solution with multiple AVMs. For more on AVM basics and the role they play in assessing property value, read our blog, What is an AVM? Everything you need to know.
A single AVM can be a capable method of obtaining property value, but using a solution that pulls from multiple AVMs can be a more reliable, cost-effective valuation strategy. Valuation solutions that leverage multiple AVMs often use a “waterfall” approach, which is a structured sequence of AVMs that pulls from multiple or differing data sources, mathematical models and geographical criteria to help provide the right property valuation model output based on user-defined criteria.
Using a waterfall approach can help support certain valuation metric requirements needed to maintain compliance, meet satisfactory confidence thresholds and secure more reliable valuation outputs. Additionally, an individual AVM may perform differently based on the geography, property type and living area. By leveraging a solution with multiple AVMs or an AVM waterfall, these three factors are already taken into consideration to provide the most appropriate valuation output for the specificities of the subject property.
The waterfall method employs a four-step approach to obtain the property valuation needed:
Using a solution with multiple AVMs or an AVM waterfall may offer a more reliable approach to obtaining a property value than using a single AVM. However, its success depends on a rigorous testing and validation process, as well as consistent monitoring. This helps to provide valuation results that are transparent, consistent and accurate, fostering stakeholder confidence while supporting regulatory requirements.
Types of AVM testing
Continuous monitoring
AVMs are consistently monitored to produce highly accurate results and lower the number of outlier valuation outputs. Maintenance involves continuous tracking of model performance and market conditions. Any economic shift may influence data accuracy. Regular updates and refinements to the models’ algorithms based on this tracking can help optimize valuation outputs.
Transparency
Lenders and real estate professionals need to engage with an AVM provider that regularly discloses their data sources and processes.
ICE’s Property Valuation Model leverages multiple ICE AVMs and selects the most appropriate output based on a variety of factors, including the geography of the property and model’s preference data, resulting in optimal performance. Each of the individual AVMs rely on the same data but use different algorithms and techniques when arriving at valuation estimates. Property Valuation Model delivers automated, configurable preference data based on user-defined rules to determine which model to leverage for the subject property.
Increased efficiency
By deploying our Property Valuation Model, users can seamlessly automate property valuations across different scenarios in an efficient and data-driven manner. This drastically reduces the turnaround times for property valuations and minimizes inconsistencies that may exist in other valuation methods.
Enhanced accuracy and regulatory compliance
Using multiple AVMs is an improved way to obtain high-quality results and support regulatory compliance. By leveraging various data sources and methodologies, the risk of inaccurate or inconsistent valuations can decrease significantly. This is due to covering a wide range of various valuation performance metrics with multiple AVMs that have been evaluated for accuracy, data integrity, objectivity and subject to random testing.
Broader coverage
Different AVMs specialize in unique property segments or market conditions. By leveraging multiple models, Property Valuation Model helps provide greater geographic and property-type coverage, which can eliminate blind spots caused by the limitations of utilizing only one model.
Expedited turn times
Property Valuation Model also helps streamline the property valuation process, reducing the dependency on manual processes. The solution can also be used to assist, inform, expedite and in some cases be used in place of the traditional appraisal process. A quicker process can lead to faster decision-making and reduced costs for lenders and other users.
Risk mitigation
Property Valuation Model reduces reliance on a single model, thereby mitigating risks linked to limited data or inherent model biases. Leveraging multiple AVMs helps provide robust valuations, even in volatile or atypical market conditions. Proper testing and ongoing monitoring of the ICE AVMs that make up Property Valuation Model is also key to reducing compliance risk and securing the high hit rates and accuracy users desire.
Configurability
Property Valuation Model provides flexible configuration of preference data to meet specific business needs based on loan types, regions or property categories.
By adopting ICE’s Property Valuation Model, users can unlock the potential for more accurate and efficient results. To learn more about how our Property Valuation Model supports compliance and provides objective and consistent modeling through high-quality data, optimal hit rates, proven methodologies, rigorous testing and complete transparency, click here.
Follow us on Linkedin
Access Mortgage Monitor reports
2025 Borrower Insights Survey report